Harold F. Cochran v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
Harold F. Cochran v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
340 F.2d 709; 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6719
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Harold F. Cochran v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
Opinion
There is sufficient evidence in the case at bar to justify the conclusion that the negligence of the defendant played a part in causing the plaintiff’s injury. The defendant-appellant argues in this court for the first time that a new trial should be granted because the verdict was against the weight of the medical evidence. Since this issue was not raised in the court below, we shall not consider it here. United States v. Ivy Hall Apartments, Inc., 310 F.2d 5, 10 (3 Cir. 1962). The judgment will be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.