U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1966

Bey v. Muldoon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided January 27, 1966

354 F.2d 1005; 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2360 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Sidney J. Smolinsky, Philadelphia, Pa. (Bernard Sacks, Dorfman, Pechner, Sacks & Dorfman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant., William R. Deasey, Philadelphia, Pa. (Kelly, Deasey & Scanlan, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Corry, Kelly, Muldoon, Sobelman and Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass’n,, Marvin I. Barish, Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham E. Freedman, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for ILA, Trustees of Pension Fund et al.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Reinforcing Iron Workers Local Union 426 v. Bechtel Power Corp. (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1978)
Mosley v. National Maritime Union Pension & Welfare Plan (District Court, E.D. New York 1977)
Lewis v. Seanor Coal Company (3d Cir. 1967)
Lewis v. Seanor Coal Co. (3d Cir. 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Much of the previous history of this case is set out in 217 F.Supp. 401 (E.D.Pa. 1962), id., 404 (E.D.Pa. 1963) and 223 F.Supp. 489 (E.D.Pa. 1963), and need not be repeated here. The agreement was reformed in accordance with the opinion last cited and as required by it. See id. supra, 496. An examination of the record and of the briefs and consideration of the oral arguments lead us to the conclusion that the court below committed no error. Consequently, the order of the court below requiring judgment to be entered for the defendants and dissolving the injunction restraining the transfer of money from the royalty fund will be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.