McSparran v. Subers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
McSparran v. Subers, 356 F.2d 983 (3d Cir. 1966)
McSparran v. Subers
Opinion of the Court
We find that as to the merits, with particular reference to the primary questions of liability of appellants, the first trial of these suits was without substantial error and that the issues were properly submitted to the jury.
We further find that the refusal of the trial judge to mold the verdicts in these causes after the first trial thereof was within his discretion.
The judgments in these cases will be affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Stella McSPARRAN, Administratrix of the Estate of Ignatius Peter Kane v. Edward Thomas SUBERS Stella McSPARRAN, Administratrix of the Estate of Ignatius Peter Kane v. John HANIGAN, Individually and Trading as the Hanigan Construction Company, Walter Hinkle, Individually and Trading as the Hinkle Excavation Company and Robert R. Tyler, Individually and Trading as the Robert R. Tyler and Co. and John McShain, Inc. (Third-Party Plaintiff) v. WILLIAM H. WALTERS & SONS, INC. (Third-Party Defendant). Stella McSparran, Administratrix of the Estate of Ignatius Peter Kane, in No. 15477. John Hanigan, Individually and Trading as the Hanigan Construction Company, in No. 15478. Walter Hinkle, Individually and Trading as the Hinkle Excavation Company, in No. 15479. Robert R. Tyler, Individually and Trading as the Robert R. Tyler Company, in No. 15480
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published