Foster v. Maldonado
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the petition of defendant, Ruben Dario Maldonado, for leave to take an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1292(b) (1964) and Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, from the interlocutory order of the District Court which determined that in this wrongful death action the appropriate choice of law on damages was that of Pennsylvania rather than New Jersey. Pennsylvania law would produce a larger recovery because the Pennsylvania Survival Act, 20 P.S. §§ 320.601-320.603 (1950), unlike that of New Jersey, permits the decedent’s estate to recover the present net worth of decedent’s loss of earnings during life expectancy, less the amount of his expected expenditures. The District Court has certified that an interlocutory appeal would materially advance the ultimate determination of the litigation. Resolution of the choice of law question at this juncture, however, followed by a trial on damages only (liability is conceded) might well produce a second appeal to this Court raising additional issues. It would seem more appropriate for the District Court to submit the damage claim to the jury with
The petition for leave to appeal is, therefore, denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ada B. FOSTER, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Mark Foster and Ada B. Foster, General Administratrix of the Estate of Mark Foster v. Ruben Dario MALDONADO and James R. Jones Ruben Dario Maldonado, Jr.
- Cited By
- 7 cases
- Status
- Published