U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1972

Laszlo Habda v. Jack Wysocker, Esq

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided May 1, 1972 · Hastie, Gibbons, Becker

458 F.2d 537; 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9818 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Laszlo Habda, in pro. per., Ralph De Sevo, De Sevo, Cerutti, Lom-badi & Fitzpatrick, Jersey City, N. J., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Commonwealth v. Carsia (Pa. 1985)
Joseph Carl Brown, Jr. v. Richard P. Joseph, Esquire (3d Cir. 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s civil action for damages against his former attorney alleges that the attorney in a criminal case in a state court neglected to challenge the legal sufficiency of an indictment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that there was no federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1343. On the authority of Thomas v. Howard, 455 F.2d 228 (3d Cir., filed Feb. 9, 1972), we affirm.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.