Jacobson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT
The Supreme Court — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3204, 96 L.Ed.2d 691 having vacated our decision in Jacobson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 797 F.2d 1197 (3d Cir. 1986), and remanded the proceeding to us in light of Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987), we in turn now vacate the district court’s decision in Jacobson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 605 F.Supp. 510 (W.D.Pa. 1984), and remand the case for further action consistent with the Supreme Court’s mandate.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Estelle JACOBSON and Cynthia Carson, in Nos. 85-3311 and 85-3343 v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and Robert M. Kolaczynski, in No. 85-3282 Marilyn E. BURRIS v. PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON AND CURTIS, INC., Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc., and Donald J. Porter. Appeal of SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & CO., INC. Herbert BLUMENTHAL v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC. and Daniel J. Turov. Appeal of Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published