Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party, 867 F.2d 1330 (3d Cir. 1989)
1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3072; 1989 WL 15757

Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appeal in this case is patently frivolous; moreover, the appellant knew that the appeal was frivolous when it was filed. The appeal is dismissed. On receipt of our mandate, the district court shall award the appellee any damages caused by the appeal, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. The appellee is also awarded double costs. See Fed.R.App.P. 38; Collins v. Amoco Production Company, 706 F.2d 1114 (11th Cir. 1983).

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Leyda HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the HERTZ CORPORATION, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alejandro HERNANDEZ, Third Party Defendant-Appellee
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published