Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1989

Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party

Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided March 15, 1989 · Tjoflat, Johnson, Brown
867 F.2d 1330; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3072; 1989 WL 15757 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appeal in this case is patently frivolous; moreover, the appellant knew that the appeal was frivolous when it was filed. The appeal is dismissed. On receipt of our mandate, the district court shall award the appellee any damages caused by the appeal, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. The appellee is also awarded double costs. See Fed.R.App.P. 38; Collins v. Amoco Production Company, 706 F.2d 1114 (11th Cir. 1983).

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑