U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1989

United States v. Panhandle Eastern Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided March 14, 1989 · Hutchinson, Nygaard, Scirica

868 F.2d 1363; 1989 WL 20912 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Michael Joseph (argued), Dyer, Ellis, Joseph & Mills, Washington, D.C., for appellants., Gregory A. Harrison (argued), U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civil Div., Commercial Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., for appellee., Richard T. Franch (argued), Jenner and Block, Chicago, Ill., for appellee General Dynamics Corp., Michael J. Hurley (argued), Howrey & Simon, Washington, D.C., for appellees Moore McCormack Resources, Inc. and Moore McCormack LNG Transport, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Panhandle Eastern Corp. (3d Cir. 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment with respect to some of its claims. Since the order granting summary judgment, if affirmed, wholly disposes of the case and the district court has certified it for appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 (West Supp. 1988). On the merits, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware is affirmed on the opinion of Judge James L. Latchum, reported at 693 F.Supp. 88 (D.Del. 1988).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.