Vito v. Bray
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Vito v. Bray, 961 F.2d 1569 (3d Cir. 1992)
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 11036; 1992 WL 94329
Vito v. Bray
Opinion
961 F.2d 1569
Vito (Emanuel J.)
v.
Bray (Larry), McCormick (Robert), Cimacasky (Richard),
Knitter (Thomas), Bavaria (Thomas), George (Kenney), Serfass
(Robert), Flyte (Clayton), Powell (Roxanne), Ceraul (David),
Molnar (John), Lysek (Stanley), Albanese (Leroy), Philips
(Milton), Baker (David), Sabia (Tony), Prichard (Richard),
Dearment (Douglas), Bushkirk (David), Blue Mountain
Consolidated Water Company, Borough of Wind Gap, Wind Gap
Borough, Wind Gap Planning Commissioner
NO. 91-1866
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Apr 10, 1992
1
Appeal From: E.D.Pa.
2
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Vito (Emanuel J.) v. Bray (Larry), McCormick (Robert), Cimacasky (Richard), Knitter (Thomas), Bavaria (Thomas), George (Kenney), Serfass (Robert), Flyte (Clayton), Powell (Roxanne), Ceraul (David), Molnar (John), Lysek (Stanley), Albanese (Leroy), Philips (Milton), Baker (David), Sabia (Tony), Prichard (Richard), Dearment (Douglas), Bushkirk (David), Blue Mountain Consolidated Water Company, Borough of Wind Gap, Wind Gap Borough, Wind Gap Planning Commissioner
- Status
- Published