Vito v. Bray

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Vito v. Bray, 961 F.2d 1569 (3d Cir. 1992)
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 11036; 1992 WL 94329

Vito v. Bray

Opinion

961 F.2d 1569

Vito (Emanuel J.)
v.
Bray (Larry), McCormick (Robert), Cimacasky (Richard),
Knitter (Thomas), Bavaria (Thomas), George (Kenney), Serfass
(Robert), Flyte (Clayton), Powell (Roxanne), Ceraul (David),
Molnar (John), Lysek (Stanley), Albanese (Leroy), Philips
(Milton), Baker (David), Sabia (Tony), Prichard (Richard),
Dearment (Douglas), Bushkirk (David), Blue Mountain
Consolidated Water Company, Borough of Wind Gap, Wind Gap
Borough, Wind Gap Planning Commissioner

NO. 91-1866

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Apr 10, 1992

1

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.

2

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Vito (Emanuel J.) v. Bray (Larry), McCormick (Robert), Cimacasky (Richard), Knitter (Thomas), Bavaria (Thomas), George (Kenney), Serfass (Robert), Flyte (Clayton), Powell (Roxanne), Ceraul (David), Molnar (John), Lysek (Stanley), Albanese (Leroy), Philips (Milton), Baker (David), Sabia (Tony), Prichard (Richard), Dearment (Douglas), Bushkirk (David), Blue Mountain Consolidated Water Company, Borough of Wind Gap, Wind Gap Borough, Wind Gap Planning Commissioner
Status
Published