U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1992

In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided May 11, 1992 · Alito, Becker, Cowen, Greenberg, Higginbotham, Hutchinson, Mansmann, Nygaard, Roth, Scirica, Sloviter, Stapleton

963 F.2d 567 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Rodney Curtis Hamrick (4th Cir. 1995)
In re Special Counsel Investigation (District Court, District of Columbia 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter having come before the court in banc pursuant to this court’s Internal Operating Procedure 9.4.1, it is hereby

ORDERED that the order of the district court dated May 8, 1991, 766 F.Supp. 358, quashing the subpoenas duces tecum to Janet Williams and the Pittsburgh Press Company, Michael Bucsko and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, WPXI, Inc., and Westinghouse Broadcasting Company, Inc., t/d/b/a KDKA-TV to produce documents before the Grand Jury be, and the same is, hereby affirmed by an equally divided court.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.