Industry Network v. Armstrong
Industry Network v. Armstrong
Opinion
Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
5-4-1995 Industry Network v Armstrong Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 94-5132
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "Industry Network v Armstrong" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 109. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/109
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos. 94-5132 and 94-5164
THE INDUSTRY NETWORK SYSTEM, INC. V. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. STEVEN M. KRAMER, Appellant
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (D.C. Civil Action No. 84-03837)
Argued December 1, 1994 Before: HUTCHINSON and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges and SEITZ, Senior Circuit Judge ORDER AMENDING OPINION
It is hereby ordered that the Court's Opinion be corrected as follows: On page 4, line 5 of the slip opinion, after the numeral 3 for the footnote, delete the rest of the paragraph to the Roman numeral I.
On page 8, the next to last line, put a period "." after "misplaced," and delete the rest of the sentence.
On page 9, line 1, delete "as in Pennsylvania." BY THE COURT /S/ Richard L. Nygaard Circuit Judge Dated: May 4, 1995
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.