Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2-2-1995

Helen v DiDario Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 94-1243

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

Recommended Citation "Helen v DiDario" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 28. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/28

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 94-1243

HELEN L., BEVERLY D., FLORENCE H., ILENE F., IDELL S., and AMERICAN DISABLED FOR ATTENDANT PROGRAMS TODAY ("A.D.A.P.T.")

Idell S., Appellant

v.

ALBERT L. DiDARIO, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of Norristown State Hospital, and KAREN F. SNIDER, in her capacity as Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare

Karen F. Snider, Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 92-6054)

Argued September 13, 1994

Before: MANSMANN, COWEN and McKEE, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following portion of the

Slip Opinion at 15 filed in this case on January 31, 1995: "The prohibitions contained in the later regulations are under a regulation which states 'Discriminatory actions prohibited.'

(b)(1). That regulation does not state that the actions set forth are prohibited per se. Rather, it states that recipients of federal funds may not engage in the enumerated acts 'on the basis of handicap.'

(b)(1)."

be amended as follows: "The prohibitions contained in the later regulations are under a regulation which states 'Discriminatory actions prohibited.'

(b)(1). That regulation does not state that the actions set forth are prohibited per se. Rather, it states that recipients of federal funds may not engage in the enumerated acts 'on the basis of handicap.'

(b)(1)."

BY THE COURT

/s/ Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge

Dated: February 2, l995