U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1997

DeBlase v. Roth

DeBlase v. Roth
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided October 31, 1997

DeBlase v. Roth

Opinion

Opinions of the United 1997 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

10-31-1997 DeBlase v. Roth Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 96-1088

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997 Recommended Citation "DeBlase v. Roth" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 256. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/256

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ NO. 96-1088 _______________

THOMAS DEBLASE, Appellant v. LAWRENCE V. ROTH, WARDEN, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA _______________ Argued February 6, 1997 Before: STAPLETON and MANSMANN, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI*, Judge Reargued En Banc October 29, 1997 Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, Circuit Judges _______________

O R D E R

This matter having come before the court en banc by order of this court dated July 30, 1997, following the grant of rehearing pursuant to this court's Internal Operating Procedure 9.4.1., it is hereby ___________________ * Hon. Jane A. Restani, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

O R D E R E D that the order of the district court dated January 11, 1996 denying and dismissing appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S. Code 2254 be and is hereby affirmed by an equally divided court.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

By the Court, /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Chief Judge

Dated: October 31, 1997

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.