Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea

Opinion

Opinions of the United 1998 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

9-8-1998

Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 97-5004

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998

Recommended Citation "Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea" (1998). 1998 Decisions. Paper 216. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998/216

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1998 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Filed September 8, 1998

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 97-5004

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY

v.

DOMINICK D'ANDREA, INC.,

Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff

v.

ALMONESSON ASSOCIATES; TARQUINI ORGANIZATION; THE DOUGLAS COMPANY; JOHN DOE 1-10, being a fictitious person, corporation or entity,

Third-Party Defendants

Dominick D'Andrea, Inc.,

Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of New Jersey (D.C. No.: 93-cv-1765)

Argued: January 22, 1998

Before: SLOVITER, LEWIS, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed on July 10, 1998, be amended as follows:

Add the following footnote to the concurring opinion to be signaled at the end of the text on page 24 of the slip opinion: Following the filing of this opinion, four district court judges of the District of New Jersey who are familiar with the magistrate judge in question have informed me that the magistrate judge is "one of the most understanding, patient, and attorney-friendly judges [they] know." Nothing in this opinion is intended to reflect on the ability of the magistrate judge, nor on his behavior or performance in any case other than the one at issue.

By the Court,

Dolores K. Sloviter Circuit Judge

Dated: September 8, 1998

A True Copy: Teste:

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Reference

Status
Unknown