Opinions of the United 1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2-11-1999

Kapral v. USA Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 97-5545

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999

Recommended Citation "Kapral v. USA" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 37. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/37

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 97-5545 Kapral v. USA

The following modifications have been made to the Court's opinion issued on February 2, 1999 in the above-entitled appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion:

On page 25 of the slip opinion, please remove the "," after the word "but" so that the sentence reads as follows: I would not quarrel with the canon set out in Russello even if it were my prerogative to do so, but I do not agree . . . .

On page 27, please insert a "." following the closed parenthesis so that the sentence reads as follows: See 464 U.S. at 23 ("We would not presume to ascribe this difference to a simple mistake in draftsmanship.").

Lastly, on page 28, please insert quotation marks following the word "final" so that the sentence reads as follows: Like many prior habeas reform bills introduced during the preceding decade, . . . including "the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final."

/s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk

February 11, 1999