Opinions of the United 1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

1-26-1999

Buehl v. Vaughn Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 97-1241

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999

Recommended Citation "Buehl v. Vaughn" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 21. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/21

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OFFICE OF THE CLERK P. DOUGLAS SISK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TELEPHONE CLERK FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT215-597-1895 21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 601 MARKET STREET PHILADELPHIA 19106-1790

January 26, 1999

West Publishing Company Editorial Dept. 610 Opperman Drive Eagan, MN 55123

Re: Beuhl vs. Vaughn. 97-1241

Dear Publisher:

Please make the following correction to the Opinion in Beuhl, No. 97-1241, filed on January 20, 1999:

Please change the last sentence in footnote 11 to read:

As noted below, however, the Supreme Court has expresly reserved decision on the question whether this rationale applies to cases where the jury returns inconsistent guilty verdicts, and we have stated that logically incompatible guilty verdicts may not stand. See United States v. Gross,

(3d Cir.), cert. denied,

(1992).

Please italicize "See" "United States v. Gross" and "cert. denied"

Kindly acknowledge receipt on the enclosed copy of this letter.

Very truly yours, P. DOUGLAS SISK, CLERK

By: Phyllis Ruffin, Case Manager

cc: Commerce Clearing House, Inc. U. S. Law Week Lexis David Rudovsky, Esq. Mary M. Killinger, Esq. Hon. John R. Padova