Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

8-8-2000

Kreschollek v. Southern Stevedoring Co Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 99-5599

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000

Recommended Citation "Kreschollek v. Southern Stevedoring Co" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 161. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/161

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2000 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Filed August 8, 2000

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 99-5599

CARL KRESCHOLLEK, Appellant

v.

SOUTHERN STEVEDORING COMPANY; LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY; ROBERT REICH, Individually, and in his capacity as Secretary of Labor and Industry of the United States of America; DAVID LOTZ, Individually, and in his capacity as D irector of the Office of Workers' Compensation

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATERFRONT EMPLOYERS AND THE SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, Intervener-Plaintiff in D.C.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 93-cv-03903) District Judge: Honorable Joseph H. Rodriguez

Argued: June 14, 2000

Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, ALDISERT, Circuit Judge and O'KELLEY, District Judge.*

(Filed: July 28, 2000)

_________________________________________________________________ * Honorable William C. O'Kelley, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia, sitting by designation. ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

It is HEREBY ORDERED that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on July 28, 2000, be amended as follows:

Page 6, Paragraph 2, "Barksalary v. Smith" should be changed to "Baksalary v. Smith"

Page 8, Footnote 1, "20 C.F.R. 702.105" should read "20 C.F.R. S 702.105"

Page 9, Paragraph 2, first sentence, "receipt of notice than an employer" should read "receipt of notice that an employer"

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Ruggero J. Aldisert Circuit Judge

DATED: August 8, 2000

A True Copy: Teste:

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2