Checkpoint Sys Inc v. Check Point Software
Checkpoint Sys Inc v. Check Point Software
Opinion
Opinions of the United 2001 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
10-26-2001 Checkpoint Sys Inc v. Check Point Software Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 00-2373
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001 Recommended Citation "Checkpoint Sys Inc v. Check Point Software" (2001). 2001 Decisions. Paper 248. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001/248
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2001 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].
Filed October 26, 2001 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 00-2373 CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant v. CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey D.C. Civil Action No. 96-cv-03153 (Honorable Jerome B. Simandle) Argued April 5, 2001 Before: SCIRICA, AMBRO and GIBSON,* Circuit Judges
_________________________________________________________________ * The Honorable John R. Gibson, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Judicial Circuit, sitting by designation.
ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed October 19, 2001, be amended as follows: Page 48, lines 20-21, the sentence which reads: "In its limited discussion of the reverse discrimination claim, the court stated," shall read: "In its limited discussion of the reverse confusion claim, the court stated," BY THE COURT, /s/Anthony J. SciricaCircuit Judge DATED: October 26, 2001 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.