Opinions of the United 2001 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

6-4-2001

Bohler Uddeholm Amer v. Ellwood Grp Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 99-3773

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001

Recommended Citation "Bohler Uddeholm Amer v. Ellwood Grp Inc" (2001). 2001 Decisions. Paper 121. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001/121

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2001 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNREPORTED

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 99-3773 ______________

BOHLER-UDDEHOLM AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation; BOHLER-UDDEHOLM COPORATION, a New York Corporation

v.

ELLWOOD GROUP, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation; ELLWOOD QUALITY STEELS COMPANY, a Pennsylvania business trust; ELLWOOD SPECIALTY STEEL COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation DAVID E. BARENSFELD, an individual;

v.

BOHLER-UDDEHOLM COPORATION, a New York corporation; UDDEHOLM LIMITED, a Canadian corporation

Ellwood Group, Inc.; Ellwood Quality Steels Co.; Ellwood Specialty Steel Co.; David Barensfeld; Bjorn E. Gabrielsson, Appellants _______________________________________

On Appeal From the United States District Court For the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. Nos. 91-cv-00706 and 96-cv-00734) District Judge: Honorable Robert J. Cindrich _________________________________________

Argued: July 19, 2000

Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

________________________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION _________________________

The slip opinion filed on April 11, 2001 in the above case is hereby amended as follows: 1. On page 10, line8, the word "misrepresentation" should be replaced with "misappropriation." BY THE COURT:

/s/Edward R. Becker Chief Judge

DATED: June 4, 2001