U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 2002

United States v. Pharis

United States v. Pharis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided September 30, 2002

United States v. Pharis

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

9-30-2002 USA v. Pharis Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 00-2855

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002 Recommended Citation "USA v. Pharis" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 622. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/622

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2002 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].

PRECEDENTIAL Filed September 30, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 00-2855 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. DAVID M. PHARIS; EDWARD J. HABINA; WILLIAM M. DULL; HARRY GANGLOFF On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal Nos. 99-cr-00743-1; 99-cr-00743-2; 99-cr-00743-3; and 99-cr-00743-4) District Judge: Hon. Herbert J. Hutton Argued May 31, 2001 Before: SLOVITER, FUENTES and COWEN, Circuit Judges Reargued En Banc February 13, 2002 Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN,* SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE, RENDELL, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES and COWEN, Circuit Judge s ________________________________________________________________ * Hon. Carol Los Mansmann participated in the oral argument and decision in this case, but died before she could join or concur in this Opinion.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed July 26, 2002, be amended as follows: Page 23, line 8 - the word "mistrial" should be changed to "retrial," so that the line will read "double jeopardy does not bar retrial, Dinitz, 424 U.S. 606- . . . ." By the Court, /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Circuit Judge Dated: September 30, 2002 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.