United States v. Boone
United States v. Boone
Opinion
Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
2-15-2002
USA v. Boone Precedential or Non-Precedential:
Docket 99-5439
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002
Recommended Citation "USA v. Boone" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 131. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/131
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2002 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Filed February 15, 2002
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos. 99-5439/5695/5894
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
LARRY BOONE,
Appellant No.: 99-5439
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
THOMAS WESTON, aka Rasul
Thomas Weston, Appellant No.: 99-5695
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant No.: 99-5894
v.
THOMAS WESTON, aka Rasul
On Appeal and Cross-Appeal from the Judgment of Conviction and Sentence of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Crim. No. 99-cr-005898) District Judge: Hon. Garrett E. Brown, Jr.
Argued: September 15, 2000
Before: ROTH, McKEE and RENDELL, Circuit Judge s ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on January 29, 2002, be amended as follows:
On page 12, delete the first sentence in the third paragraph which reads: "The testimony regarding the search of Weston's night club did not amount to plain error." And, replace it with the following: "The district court's admission of the testimony regarding the search of Weston's night club was not an abuse of discretion."
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge
DATED: February 15, 2002
A True Copy: Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown