Allah v. Horn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Allah v. Horn, 28 F. App'x 120 (3d Cir. 2002)
Allah v. Horn
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Michael Malik Allah appeals from the District Court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. In its brief, the government concedes that Allah did exhaust his administrative remedies, and this case should be remanded. Accordingly, we will VACATE the District Court’s order granting the state defendants’ motion to dismiss and will REMAND for further proceedings.
Allah also appeals the District Court’s order granting Dr. Falor’s motion to dismiss. We will AFFIRM that order, as we agree that Allah failed to state a claim against Dr. Falor.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Michael Malik ALLAH v. Martin HORN, (Comm.) Robert S. Bitner, (Corc) (Supt.) Ben Varner (Deputy Supt.) Gregory R. White (Dscs) Paul J. Stowitzsky (Major) Dennis Duke (Capt.) Sparbanie (Capt.) Kingston (Lt.) Matzus (Lt.) Roach (Lt.) Grainy Charles Rossi Ms. Kelly (D.A.T.S.) J. Hewitt Clyde Haught Dr. Falor (U.M.) Jean Mears (U.M.) Kent Warman (Sgt.) Mitchell (Cam II) John D'Eletto Maria Balestrieri, Counselor Ben E. Ansey, Hearing Examiner T. Scott Burris, Tr. Coor. Michael P. Bruno, Cam I Joyce A. Korman, Unite Manager R.W. Sell, Counselor
- Status
- Published