OPINION

Mohammad Issa pled guilty to one count of unlawful re-entry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and 1326(b)(2). Issa was sentenced to 30 months imprisonment. 1

Issa’s attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), expressing his belief that there were no nonMvolous issues presented for our review. As required by Anders, counsel directed us to portions of the record that might arguably support an appeal. Also, as required by Anders, Issa was given notice of his attorney’s desire to withdraw, allowing him the opportunity to raise any issues for appeal in a supplemental pro se brief. He failed to do so. Issa’s attorney raised one possible ground for appeal: whether the District Court erred in not granting a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0.

U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 gives the District Court discretion to sentence outside the recommended guidelines if the court finds there to be an aggravating or mitigating circumstance that the Sentencing Commission may not have taken into consideration when formulating the guidelines. This section also points out that this is a case-by-case determination for the court.

Issa argued to the District Court that his mitigating circumstance was that he had no choice but to board a flight to the United States with his minor sons as they were fleeing violent unrest in Palestine. However, the District Court, under its proper discretion, rejected this argument and denied Issa’s U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 motion to downward depart. We find that the District Court did not abuse its discretion.

For the foregoing reasons, we will dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and we will grant counsel’s request to withdraw.