United States v. Constant
United States v. Constant
Opinion
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
12-30-2004 USA v. Constant Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-1025
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "USA v. Constant" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 27. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/27
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-1025 ___________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IVAN CONSTANT, Appellant ___________
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 02-cr-00434-1) District Judge: The Honorable Anita B. Brody ___________ Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) December 13, 2004
Before: NYGAARD, ROSENN, and BECKER, Circuit Judges.
(Filed: December 30, 2004)
___________ OPINION OF THE COURT ___________ NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Arguing that the felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to him, Appellant Ivan Constant challenges his conviction under that statute. As we have previously considered and rejected an identical claim, see United States v. Singletary, 268 F.3d 196 (3d Cir. 2001), we affirm his conviction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.