Fielder v. Varner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Fielder v. Varner

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

8-17-2004

Fielder v. Varner Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 01-1463

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004

Recommended Citation "Fielder v. Varner" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 370. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/370

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 01-1463

ANTHONY FIELDER,

Appellant

v.

BENJAMIN VARNER; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(Dist. Court No. 00-cv-02599) District Court Judge: Honorable Louis Charles Bechtle

Argued: January 12, 2004

Before: ALITO, CHERTOFF, and BECKER, Circuit Judges.

(Opinion Filed: August 9, 2004) ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The opinion in the above case is hereby amended as follows:

1. On page 3 in the right column, the line reading, “As a consequence, the Magistrate Judge stated, Fielder’s time to file his petition began to run one year thereafter, on April 24, 1997. See Burns v. Morton,

134 F.3d 109, 110

(3d Cir. 1998),” should be changed as follows:

As a consequence, the Magistrate Judge stated that Fielder’s time to file his petition began to run on April 24, 1996. See Burns v. Morton,

134 F.3d 109, 110

(3d Cir. 1998).

/s/ Samuel A. Alito, Jr. Circuit Judge

Dated: August 17, 2004

Reference

Status
Published