United States v. Sparrow
United States v. Sparrow
Opinion
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
8-3-2004
USA v. Sparrow Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential
Docket No. 02-3571
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004
Recommended Citation "USA v. Sparrow" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 380. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/380
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 02-3571
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
GAYLORD SPARROW,
Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal Action No. 99-cr-00290) District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle, III
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) March 23, 2004
Before: ROTH, AMBRO, and CHERTOFF, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed June 15, 2004)
Stephen J. Binhak, Esq. 3103 Philmont Avenue Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006
Attorney for Appellant
Patrick L. Meehan United States Attorney Laurie Magid Deputy United States Attorney Emily McKillip Assistant United States Attorney Judy Goldstein Smith Assistant United States Attorney 615 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106
Attorneys for Appellee
ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION
AM BRO, Circuit Judge
It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above case filed June 15, 2004, be amended as follows:
On page three, in footnote 3, second line, delete the hyphen (– ) between the words “opinion” and “United”, and replace it with a period, followed by two spaces, the word “See” and a space. The lines should read, “We did address it, however, in a not precedential opinion. See United States v. Morgan,
33 Fed. Appx. 603(3d Cir. 2002).”
By the Court,
/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge
Dated: August 3, 2004
2
Reference
- Status
- Published