Boone v. Comm Social Security
Boone v. Comm Social Security
Opinion
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
2-19-2004
Boone v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential
Docket No. 02-3256
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004
Recommended Citation "Boone v. Comm Social Security" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 952. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/952
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 02-3256
SARAH M. BOONE, Appellant
v.
*JO ANNE BARNHART COMM ISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
*(Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 43(c))
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 01-cv-04231) District Judge: Honorable Herbert J. Hutton
Argued March 13, 2003
Before: BECKER*, RENDELL, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed December 18, 2003)
Peter J. Pinnola, Esquire (Argued) Pinnola & Bomstein 8039 Old York Road Elkins Park, PA 19027
Attorney for Appellant
* Judge Becker concluded his term as Chief Judge on May 4, 2003. James A. Winn Regional Chief Counsel Lori Karimoto (Argued) Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration OGC/Region III P.O. Box 41777 Philadelphia, PA 19101
Patrick L. Meehan United States Attorney Joan Garner Assistant United States Attorney Eastern District of Pennsylvania 615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250 Philadelphia, PA 19106-4476
Attorneys for Appellee
ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION
AM BRO, Circuit Judge
It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above case filed December 18, 2003, be amended as follows:
On page 13, in the second full paragraph, line 13, the word “Unskilled” should not be capitalized. Replace the upper case “U” with a lower case “u” so that the phrase reads, “‘[u]nskilled types ...’”.
On page 13, in the second full paragraph, line 20, insert the word “performing” after the word “of”, so that the phrase reads, “...likely to require a higher degree of skill than she is capable of performing.”
By the Court,
/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: February 19, 2004
2
Reference
- Status
- Published