Boone v. Comm Social Security

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Boone v. Comm Social Security

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2-19-2004

Boone v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 02-3256

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004

Recommended Citation "Boone v. Comm Social Security" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 952. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/952

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 02-3256

SARAH M. BOONE, Appellant

v.

*JO ANNE BARNHART COMM ISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

*(Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 43(c))

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 01-cv-04231) District Judge: Honorable Herbert J. Hutton

Argued March 13, 2003

Before: BECKER*, RENDELL, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed December 18, 2003)

Peter J. Pinnola, Esquire (Argued) Pinnola & Bomstein 8039 Old York Road Elkins Park, PA 19027

Attorney for Appellant

* Judge Becker concluded his term as Chief Judge on May 4, 2003. James A. Winn Regional Chief Counsel Lori Karimoto (Argued) Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration OGC/Region III P.O. Box 41777 Philadelphia, PA 19101

Patrick L. Meehan United States Attorney Joan Garner Assistant United States Attorney Eastern District of Pennsylvania 615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250 Philadelphia, PA 19106-4476

Attorneys for Appellee

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

AM BRO, Circuit Judge

It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above case filed December 18, 2003, be amended as follows:

On page 13, in the second full paragraph, line 13, the word “Unskilled” should not be capitalized. Replace the upper case “U” with a lower case “u” so that the phrase reads, “‘[u]nskilled types ...’”.

On page 13, in the second full paragraph, line 20, insert the word “performing” after the word “of”, so that the phrase reads, “...likely to require a higher degree of skill than she is capable of performing.”

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: February 19, 2004

2

Reference

Status
Published