C.N. v. Ridgewood Bd of Ed

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

C.N. v. Ridgewood Bd of Ed

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

12-12-2005

C.N. v. Ridgewood Bd of Ed Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 04-2849

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

Recommended Citation "C.N. v. Ridgewood Bd of Ed" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 25. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/25

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 04-2849

C. N., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.N., a Minor; L. M., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of V.M., a Minor; M. E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.E., a Minor,

Appellants

v.

RIDGEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION; FREDERICK J. STOKLEY; JOYCE SNIDER; RONALD VERDICCHIO; ROBERT WEAKLEY; JOHN MUCCIOLO; ANTHONY BENCIVENGA; SHEILA BROGAN

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 00-cv-01072) District Judge: Honorable Jose L. Linares

Argued April 1, 2005 Before: ALITO, SMITH and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion in the above case, filed December 1, 2005, be amended as follows: Page 31, the last two sentences in the first full paragraph, which read: We explain both conclusions in Part V, sub-sections A & B. Then, in Part VI, we explain why, even assuming the survey was involuntary, no constitutional violations have been shown. shall read: We explain both conclusions in Part IV, sub-sections A & B. Then, in Part V, we explain why, even assuming the survey was involuntary, no constitutional violations have been shown.

By the Court,

/s/ D. Michael Fisher Circuit Judge Dated: December 12, 2005

2

Reference

Status
Published