Mahmood v. Atty Gen USA

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Mahmood v. Atty Gen USA

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

11-30-2005

Mahmood v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 03-3760

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

Recommended Citation "Mahmood v. Atty Gen USA" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 176. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/176

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 03-3760

SYED MAHMOOD,

Petitioner

v.

*ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States,

Respondent

*Substituted pursuant to Rule 43c, F.R.A.P.

On Appeal from an Order entered before The Board of Immigration Appeals (No. A 70-891-107)

Argued September 15, 2004

Before: ALITO, AMBRO and FISHER, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed October 27, 2005)

Robert Frank, Esquire (Argued) Suite 1304 60 Park Place Newark, NJ 07102

Attorney for Petitioner Peter D. Keisler Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division Barry J. Pettinato Senior Litigation Counsel David V. Bernal, Esquire Douglas E. Ginsburg, Esquire John D. Williams, Esquire William M. Martin, Esquire (Argued) United States Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation P.O. Box 878 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044

Attorneys for Respondent

ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed October 27, 2005, be amended as follows:

On page 7, footnote 3, line 3, insert “No.” after “Pub. L.” and before “109- 13,” .

On page 7, line 5, remove the word “the” after “that” and before “Mahmood’s”.

On page 7, last line of the second paragraph, add an “s” at the end of the word “motion”, so the phrase reads “deadline for motions to reopen”.

On page 8, line 8, add an “s” at the end of the word “motion”, so the phrase reads “time limit for motions to reopen”.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: November 30, 2005

Reference

Status
Published