U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 2005

Parker v. Kelchner

Parker v. Kelchner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided November 10, 2005

Parker v. Kelchner

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

11-10-2005 Parker v. Kelchner Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-3286

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "Parker v. Kelchner" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 183. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/183

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 04-3286

SHAWN PARKER,

v. DONALD KELCHNER, Superintendent; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellants.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 03-CV-0837) Magistrate Judge: Honorable Thomas M. Blewitt

Argued: October 19, 2005 Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, VAN ANTWERPEN and ALIDISERT, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: November 10, 2005) John G. Knorr, III (Argued) Thomas W. Corbett, Jr. Francis R. Filipi Office of Attorney General 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Counsel for Appellants Donald Kelchner and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania Linda J. Shorey Amy L. Groff (Argued) David R. Fine Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham LLP North Third Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 Counsel for Appellee Shawn Parker

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The opinion previously filed in this case is amended as follows: Page 6: “Parker did not raise such any challenge” is amended to read “Parker did not raise any such challenge” Page 9: “Circuit for that favors” is amended to read “Circuit that favors”

BY THE COURT

/s/ Franklin S. Van Antwerpen Circuit Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.