United States v. Bendolph

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States v. Bendolph

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

5-20-2005

USA v. Bendolph Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 01-2468

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

Recommended Citation "USA v. Bendolph" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1085. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1085

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Nos. 01-2468 & 02-2624 _____

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

HERBERT L. BENDOLPH, Appellant at No. 01-2468 _____

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JULIO OTERO, Appellant at No. 02-2624 _____

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D.C. No. 95-cr-00068) District Judge: Honorable Sue L. Robinson

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 96-cr-00005-3) District Judge: Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo _____

Argued October 26, 2004

Reargued En Banc February 23, 2005

ORDER AMENDING OPINION _____

Per the direction of the Court, footnote #3 of the opinion filed on May 16, 2005 is amended as follows:

Although the court may act upon what plainly appears from the motion, attached exhibits and record, not all limitations issues may appear in such manner. As such, notice and an opportunity to respond should be afforded during the Rule 4 stage. See footnote 15 infra.

Furthermore, as it appears that the judgment and mandate contained a clerical error in that those documents incorrectly state that appeal at No. 02-2624 originated from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware an amended judgment and mandate shall be issued correcting the clerical error.

For the Court,

/s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk

Date: May 20, 2005 clc\cc: David R. Fine, Esq. Robert A. Lawton, Esq. Marsha A. Sajer, Esq. Michael Wiseman, Esq. Richard G. Andrews, Esq. Michael J. Bresnick, Esq. William A. Behe, Esq. Theodore B. Smith III, Esq.

Reference

Status
Published