U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 2005

In re: Kerwin

In re: Kerwin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided April 22, 2005

In re: Kerwin

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

4-22-2005 In re: Kerwin Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-4408

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "In re: Kerwin " (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1324. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1324

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].

HPS-36 (January 2005) NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 04-4408 ____________ IN RE: RYAN KERWIN, Petitioner ____________ ON A PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (Related to E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 03-cv-05645) ____________ Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. Pro.

January 21, 2005 Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

Filed: April 22, 2005 _______________________ OPINION _______________________ PER CURIAM.

Ryan Kerwin, a Pennsylvania inmate serving a five to ten-year sentence in prison imposed in January 1999 for various offenses, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Kerwin seeks to compel the District Court to render a final decision on his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On April 11, 2005, subsequent to the filing of Kerwin’s mandamus petition, the District Court entered an order denying his § 2254 petition. Because the District Court has afforded Kerwin the relief sought, we will deny the mandamus petition as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.