Lacko v. Brennan
Lacko v. Brennan
Opinion
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
3-30-2005 Lacko v. Brennan Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-1279
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "Lacko v. Brennan" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1413. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1413
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 04-1279
JAMES E. LACKO, Appellant v. JOSEPH P. BRENNAN; B.V. HYLER; MARTY D. HUDSON; MICHAEL H. HOLLAND, in their capacity as trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust; UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1974 PENSION PLAN AND TRUST
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 03-cv-00985) District Judge: Honorable Arthur J. Schwab
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) March 10, 2005
Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, ROTH and AMBRO, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: March 30, 2005)
OPINION AMBRO, Circuit Judge James Lacko appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment, which upheld the decision of an arbitrator denying Lacko a certain type of pension benefit, in favor of the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan. For the reasons stated in the arbitrator’s excellent decision in every respect (depth, organization, and rationale), we affirm the District Court’s determination.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.