Rogers v. Corbett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Rogers v. Corbett

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

11-3-2006

Rogers v. Corbett Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 06-2241

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

Recommended Citation "Rogers v. Corbett" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 150. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/150

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 06-2241

MARAKAY J. ROGERS, Esquire, Candidate for Governor of Pennsylvania; THE GREEN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, c/o Paul Teese, Chair; THE CONSTITUTION PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA; KEN V. KRAWCHUK; HAGAN SMITH,

Appellants. v.

THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR., Attorney General of Pennsylvania; COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, c/o Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania; GOVERNOR EDWARD G. RENDELL; PEDRO A. CORTES, Secretary of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania District Court No. 06-cv-00066 District Judge: Hon. John E. Jones, III

Argued on July 10, 2006

Opinion Filed August 23, 2006

Before: SMITH, ALDISERT, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

ORDER

The petition for panel rehearing filed by appellants in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and all

judges who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, the petition for panel

rehearing is granted so that the panel opinion can be amended. In light of the panel

rehearing being granted, no action is taken on the petition for rehearing en banc filed on

September 5, 2006. The Court’s Opinion filed on August 23, 2006 is vacated and the

amended opinion is being filed at this time.

By the Court,

/s/ Jane R. Roth Circuit Judge

Dated: November 3, 2006

Reference

Status
Published