Morgan v. Gay
Morgan v. Gay
Opinion
Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
10-16-2006
Morgan v. Gay Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential
Docket No. 06-8045
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006
Recommended Citation "Morgan v. Gay" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 260. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/260
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Case No: 06-8045
SARAH MORGAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
v.
DENNIS W. GAY; GINA GAY; BASIC RESEARCH, L.L.C.; BAN, L.L.C.; KLEIN-BECKER, USA L.L.C.; COVAXIL LABORATORIES, L.L.C.; CARTER-REED COMPANY, L.L.C., a/k/a THE CARTER-REED COMPANY; A.G. WATERHOUSE, L.L.C.; ALPHAGENBO TECH, L.L.C.; BODY FORUM, L.L.C.; BODY INNOVENTIONS, L.L.C.; COVARIX, L.L.C.; BYDEX MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.; NUTRASPORT, L.L.C; SOVAGE DERMALOGIC LABORATORIES, L.L.C.; WESTERN HOLDING, L.L.C.; GEORGE EVAN BYBEE; DANIEL B. MOWREY, Ph.D; NATHALIE CHEVREAU, Ph.D; MITCHELL K. FRIEDLANDER; MICAHEL MEADE,
Petitioners
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey District Court No.-06-cv-01371 District Judge: The Honorable Garrett E. Brown, Jr.
Submitted September 7, 2006
Before: BARRY, SMITH, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges __________________________
ORDER ______________________________
This cause came to be heard on a Petition for Leave to Appeal pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1453(c) from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and
was submitted on August 16, 2006. On consideration thereof, it is now ORDERED that
Defendants’ Petition for Leave to Appeal under
28 U.S.C. § 1453(c) is granted. All of the
above in accordance with the opinion of this Court.
ATTEST:
/s/ D. Brooks Smith_____________ Circuit Judge
Dated: October 16, 2006
Reference
- Status
- Published