U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 2006

United States v. Banks

United States v. Banks
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided July 7, 2006

United States v. Banks

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

7-7-2006 USA v. Banks Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 05-1715

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "USA v. Banks" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 669. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/669

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT June 28, 2006

No. 05-1715 United States of America vs. Frederick H. Banks, Appellant (Western District of Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh) Criminal No. 03-cr-00245)

PRESENT: Rendell, Van Antwerpen and Weis, Circuit Judges.

1. Letter by Appellant dated 6/21/06 Construed as a Motion to Amend Opinion.

2. Motion by Appellee to Amend Opinion.

Chiquita Dyer, 267-299-4919 Case Manager ORDER The foregoing motion by appellant to amend opinion is denied. The motion by the United States to amend is granted and the precedential opinion is amended as follows: Page 19: “procedures set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 853" is amended to read, “procedures set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 853"; and “United States v. Casey, 444 F.3d 1071, 1077 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 853)” is amended to read, “United States v. Casey, 444 F.3d 1071, 1077 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing 21 U.S.C. § 853)” Page 19, footnote 12: “remedial purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 853" is amended to read, “remedial purposes of 21 U.S.C. § 853"; and “we observe that 18 U.S.C. § 853(o)” is amended to read, “we observe that 21 U.S.C. § 853(o)” Page 21: “are appropriate under 18 U.S.C. § 853" is amended to read, “are appropriate under 21 U.S.C. § 853" By the Court,

/s/ Franklin S. Van Antwerpen Circuit Judge Dated: July 7, 2006

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.