Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

11-9-2007

Rabinowitz v. Amerigas Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 06-4037

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

Recommended Citation "Rabinowitz v. Amerigas" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 237. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/237

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 06-4037 ____________

GLORIA V. RABINOWITZ,

Appellant, v.

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P., CAREY M. MONAGHAN, and EUGENE V.N. BISSELL,

Appellees. ____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D. C. Civil No. 05-cv-04278) Magistrate Judge: Honorable Jacob P. Hart ____________

Before: SLOVITER, CHAGARES and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION ____________

At the direction of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the opinion filed by this Court on November 2, 2007 is amended insofar as the word “Sales” shall be deleted and the word “Marketing” inserted in its place on page 9 of the opinion at line 8. The sentence should state as amended: “It is undisputed that Bissell never promised Rabinowitz that a Vice President of Marketing position would be created, or guaranteed her that she would fill the position.”

For the Court,

/s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk

Date: November 9, 2007 smw/cc: Harold I. Goodman, Esq. Michael L. Banks, Esq. Russell R. Bruch, Esq.

2