Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

9-7-2007

Hartmann v. Carroll Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 04-4550

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

Recommended Citation "Hartmann v. Carroll" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 349. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/349

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 04-4550

DETLEF F. HARTMANN, Appellant

v.

THOMAS CARROLL, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF DELAWARE

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D. C. No. 03-cv-00796) District Judge: Hon. Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

At the direction of the Court, the above captioned opinion is amended to correct a typographical error on page 4 of the opinion as the correct statutory reference is

(b) rather than

(b). The opinion is amended as follows:

Moreover, Congress, in enacting AEDPA, intended to further principles of comity, finality, and federalism, which are promoted in large part through the requirement, set forth in

(b), that state remedies be exhausted before seeking federal review. Duncan v. Walker,

(2001); Williams v. Taylor,

(2000).

For the Court, /s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk

Date: September 7, 2007 tmk/cc: David R. Fine, Esq. Christopher R. Nestor, Esq. Elizabeth R. McFarlan, Esq.