Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2-8-2007

USA v. Manzella Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 06-3434

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

Recommended Citation "USA v. Manzella" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1547. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1547

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 06-3434

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

VALERIE MANZELLA,

Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal Action No. 05-cr-00289) District Judge: Honorable Arthur J. Schwab

Argued December 5, 2006

Before: RENDELL and AMBRO, Circuit Judges BAYLSON,* District Judge

(Opinion filed February 2, 2007)

Lisa B. Freeland Federal Public Defender Kimberly R. Brunson, Esquire (Argued) Office of Federal Public Defender 1001 Liberty Avenue 1450 Liberty Center Pittsburgh, PA 15222

* Honorable Michael M. Baylson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. Counsel for Appellant

Mary Beth Buchanan United States Attorney Robert L. Eberhardt, Esquire (Argued) Kelly R. Labby, Esquire Office of United States Attorney 700 Grant Street Suite 4000 Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Counsel for Appellee

ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above case filed February 2, 2007, be amended as follows:

On page 10, Section II, fifth line down, add an “s” to “United State”, so the cite reads “United States v. Howerter”.

On page 15, the last sentence of the only full paragraph, delete the letter “s” in the word “programs”, so the phrase reads, “a rehabilitative program is a practice Congress was unwilling to endorse.”.

On page 23, the first sentence of subsection B, delete the word “Additionally” and the comma, and then capitalize the word “We”, such that it begins the sentence.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: February 8, 2007

2