Cuevas v. City of Philadelphia
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Each of the contentions of the parties has been carefully considered by us, and we have heard oral argument. We have also had the benefit of Judge Pratter’s thoughtful and well reasoned forty-six page opinion. We are convinced that her analysis is not one on which we can improve, and to write separately would be to add nothing of substance to that excellent opinion; indeed, to write separately would be doing little more than paraphrasing what has already been written. Accordingly, and substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Pratter’s opinion, we will affirm.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Luz Aida CUEVAS, Individually on her own behalf and as a parent and natural guardian of and on behalf of, Delimar Vera, a minor Pedro Vera, Individually on his own behalf and as parent and natural guardian of, and on behalf of, Delimar Vera, a minor v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA Harold B. Hairston John J. Grugan Vincent W. Heeney Robert J. McBrearty Lucien Cerulli Joseph E. Rissling Haresh Mirchandani, M.D. Carl Spurill David Quain Pat Kauffman, M.D. Greg McDonald, D.O. Carolyn H. Revercomb, M.D. Richard Neal. Luz Aida Cuevas, Individually on her own behalf and as parent and natural guardian of, and on behalf of, Delimar Vera, a minor, Appellant Luz Aida Cuevas, Individually on her own behalf and as a parent and natural guardian of and on behalf of, Delimar Vera, a minor Pedro Vera, Individually on his own behalf and as parent and natural guardian of, and on behalf of, Delimar Vera, a minor v. City of Philadelphia Harold B. Hairston John J. Grugan Vincent W. Heeney Robert J. McBrearty Lucien Cerulli Joseph E. Rissling Haresh Mirchandani, M.D. Carl Spurill David Quain Pat Kauffman, M.D. Greg McDonald, D.O. Carolyn H. Revercomb, M.D. Richard Neal. Pedro Vera, individually and on his own behalf as parent of Delimar Vera
- Status
- Published