OPINION OF THE COURT

On March 21, 2007, George, a prisoner proceeding pro se, petitioned the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and improper jury instructions. On February 12, 2008, George petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order compelling the District Court to act upon his habeas corpus petition.

In the intervening time, on January 31, 2008, the District Court entered an order dismissing George’s habeas corpus petition. The District Court construed George’s petition as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismissed it as a second or successive § 2255 motion filed without authorization from the Court of Appeals.

Because the District Court has now provided George the relief he sought in his mandamus petition to this Court, ie., a ruling on his habeas corpus petition, we dismiss his mandamus petition as moot.