OPINION

Deon Earl Daley appeals from the District Court’s order dismissing his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The procedural history of this case and the details of Daley’s claims are well known to the parties, set forth in the District Court’s thorough order, and need not be discussed at length. Daley, a citizen of Jamaica, filed a § 2241 petition challenging his removal order and his continued detention. The District Court dismissed the petition. Daley filed a timely notice of appeal.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and exercise plenary review over the District Court’s legal conclusions. Cradle v. U.S. ex rel. Miner, 290 F.3d 536, 538 (3d Cir. 2002). We agree with the District Court that it did not have jurisdiction over Daley’s challenge to his removal order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(5). 1 As for Daley’s challenge to his detention, he was still within the presumptively reasonable six-month post-removal period at the time of the District Court’s order. See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001).

For the above reasons, as well as those set forth by the District Court, we will affirm the District Court’s October 29, 2007 order. Daley’s motion to dismiss is denied.