Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2-21-2008

USA v. Brown Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-1224

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

Recommended Citation "USA v. Brown" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1551. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1551

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 07-1224

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

MILTON BROWN, Appellant

_____________

Appeal from a Final Judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.N.J. Criminal No. 06-cr-00350) District Judge: Honorable William J. Martini ____________

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) on February 8, 2008 ____________

Before: McKEE, AMBRO and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges

(Filed February 21, 2008)

OPINION

PER CURIAM

On appeal, Milton Brown challenges an enhancement of his sentence based on

facts that were neither admitted by him nor found beyond a reasonable doubt. He admits that the issue he raises – whether the District Court erred in failing to apply the proof

beyond a reasonable doubt standard in determining the enhancement – was decided

adversely to him in United States v. Grier,

(3d Cir. 2007) (en banc).

Although the issue has been decided by us, Brown seeks to preserve the issue in

anticipation of review by the Supreme Court.

This panel does not have the authority to disturb the holding of an en banc decision

of this Court. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

___________

2