In re Prosser
In re Prosser
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Greenlight Capital Qualified, L.P., Greenlight Capital, L.P., and Greenlight Capital Offshore, Ltd. (collectively “Green-light”) appeal an order of the district court affirming the order of the bankruptcy court denying Greenlight’s objection to a proof of claim filed by Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”).
Inasmuch as the district court recited the factual background to this dispute in its Memorandum Opinion, we find it unnecessary to repeat that background here. See In re Prosser, 2008 WL 3979476 (D.Vi. Aug.22, 2008). The gist of Greenlight’s argument here is that, pursuant to V.I. CODE ANN. Title 9, § 39(c),
Accordingly, we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s Memorandum Opinion without further elaboration.
. “An order allowing or disallowing a claim is a final, appealable order." Orsini Santos v. Mender, 349 B.R. 762, 768 (1st Cir.BAP2006) (citing In re Perry, 391 F.3d 282, 285 (1st Cir. 2004)).
. V.I. CODE ANN. Title 9, § 39(c) provides: "At least one-third of the total number of directors shall be bona fide residents of the United States Virgin Islands, and all shall be at least 21 years of age, and shall hold shares of the bank, subscribed in their name, of a par value of not less than $1,000 which shares shall be deposited in the bank while the said directors discharge their offices.”
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.