JUDGMENT ORDER

Alfredo Gasca-Chavez appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence on the basis that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional on its face and/or 'as applied to the facts of this case. Gasca-Chavez concedes that his argument is foreclosed by binding Third Circuit precedent, and he raises the issue on appeal solely to preserve it for Supreme Court review.

The judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entered April 1, 2011, is hereby affirmed.