UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT January 9, 2012

Nos. 09-3467, 09-3731 & 09-3965

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CHRISTOPHER G. WRIGHT, Appellant (No. 09-3467) RAVINDER S. CHAWLA, Appellant (No. 09-3731) ANDREW TEITELMAN. Appellant (No. 09-3965)

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-08-cr-00450-001/002/004)

Present: AMBRO, CHAGARES and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Appellee USA to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04, 2012; and

2. Letter Response by Appellant, Christopher G. Wright, in Opposition to Motion to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04, 2012.

Respectfully, Clerk/dwb

_______________________________ O R D E R ______________________________

The foregoing motion by Appellee to amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 4, 2012 is denied. The letter response construed as a cross-motion by Appellant, Christopher G. Wright in opposition to the motion to amend is granted in part and denied in part. The opinion is amended as follows: on page 10, first full paragraph, lines 6-7, replace “with the intent” with “intending, in exchange for the benefits,”.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: February 7, 2012 Appeal Nos. 09-3467, 09-3731 & 09-3965 USA v. Christopher Wright, Ravinder Chawla and Andrew Teitelman Page 2

DWB/cc:

Jennifer A. Williams, Esq. Lisa A. Mathewson, Esq. Michael J. Bresnick, Esq. Peter Goldberger, Esq. Ellen C. Brotman, Esq.