Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Rinastuti v. Attorney General of the United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Rinastuti v. Attorney General of the United States, 487 F. App'x 763 (3d Cir. 2012)
Sloviter, Chagares, Greenberg

Rinastuti v. Attorney General of the United States

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Dhany Rinastuti, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the agency’s denial of relief. This is the companion case to C.A. No. 12-1977; Rinastuti is the partner of Ufuq Abror, the petitioner in that matter, and the relevant facts and issues in both matters are identical. Ri-nastuti fears potential persecution in Indonesia on account of a possible familial veto of her desired marriage to Abror, and also worries about societal disapproval of her children being born out of wedlock. For substantially the same reasons that we recited in 12-1977, however, Rinastuti has failed to show any basis to disturb the agency’s final order of removal. We must therefore deny this petition for review. 1

1

. We exercise jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, as limited by 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(a)(3) and 1252(d)(1).

Reference

Full Case Name
Dhany Dinar RINASTUTI, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondent
Status
Unpublished
↑