United States v. Jamar Blackshear

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States v. Jamar Blackshear

Opinion

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________

No. 12-1485 _____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JAMAR BLACKSHEAR, Appellant ________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania District Court No. 2-11-cr-00227-001 District Judge: The Honorable R. Barclay Surrick ________________________

Argued March 21, 2013

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SMITH, and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges

(Filed: August 12, 2013)

Andrew J. Schell [ARGUED] Office of United States Attorney 615 Chestnut Street Suite 1250 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Counsel for Appellee Mark E. Cedrone [ARGUED] 123 South Broad Street Suite 810 Philadelphia, PA 19109 Counsel for Appellant

________________

OPINION ________________

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Jamar Blackshear and his codefendant, Terrell Davis, appeal the denial of

their suppression motion. Blackshear has standing to challenge the search of the

rental vehicle under United States v. Baker,

221 F.3d 438

, 442–43 (3d Cir. 2000).

For the reasons stated in Parts I and II of the companion case, United States v.

Davis, No. 12-1486 (3d Cir. Aug. 9, 2013), we will affirm the District Court’s

judgment.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished