United States v. Jamar Blackshear
United States v. Jamar Blackshear
Opinion
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 12-1485 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMAR BLACKSHEAR, Appellant ________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania District Court No. 2-11-cr-00227-001 District Judge: The Honorable R. Barclay Surrick ________________________ Argued March 21, 2013 Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SMITH, and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges (Filed: August 12, 2013)
Andrew J. Schell [ARGUED] Office of United States Attorney Chestnut Street Suite 1250 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Counsel for Appellee Mark E. Cedrone [ARGUED] South Broad Street Suite 810 Philadelphia, PA 19109 Counsel for Appellant ________________ OPINION ________________
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Jamar Blackshear and his codefendant, Terrell Davis, appeal the denial of their suppression motion. Blackshear has standing to challenge the search of the rental vehicle under United States v. Baker, 221 F.3d 438, 442–43 (3d Cir. 2000).
For the reasons stated in Parts I and II of the companion case, United States v. Davis, No. 12-1486 (3d Cir. Aug. 9, 2013), we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.